Opinions on the land tax were mixed—some thought it was necessary for community growth, while others saw it as unjustly taxing the farmers and graziers.
The following extracts were taken from letters to the editor published in The Brisbane Courier.
10 May 1886
Sir,
I wish to draw attention through the medium of your paper to the ruinous loss of property that Queensland landowners will sustain if the present Government are allowed to carry out their proposed programme.
| If owners of country lands are to be ruined by such a stupendous land tax, why should not owners of town lands share the same fate? We are told, 'because the prejudices of the people must be respected,' which means that the townsman is powerful enough to protect his interests but that the countryman is not. The townsman may rest assured that if he combines with the Government to ruin us, we will combine to ruin him, and will have such a land tax put on town allotments that their value will depreciate considerably below the price he paid for them. |
'The ruinous loss of property that Queensland landowners will sustain if the present Government are allowed to carry out their proposed programme' |
If these kinds of experiments are to be tried on us, the best wish I can give to my native district of Rockhampton is, that she may go in for separation, and leave the southern part of the colony to enjoy the chaos that will result from the introduction of such laws.
G. L. G. MACDONALD.
25 August 1887
Further, I maintain, sir, that the effect of a land tax will be to lower rents, for, when a man who holds land for speculative purposes has to pay a land tax, he is compelled either to use it himself or sell to someone who will, or keep it at a loss. Being a sensible man he will choose the former alternative, and the increased quantity of land by this means made available for useful purposes must, by the inexorable law of supply and demand, cause a lowering of rents.
| 'The effect of a land tax will be to lower rents' |
For these reasons I think that the heavily rated and rack-rented tenants have something to hope for and nothing to fear from the adoption of a land tax. Those who tell them otherwise probably speak without knowledge or authority. |
JAMES G. DRAKE. Calton House, 23rd August.
8 November 1893
Sir,
The above subject [land tax], which was touched upon in your editorial columns yesterday, is generally coming to be estimated in this and the other colonies as a subject of great importance. Its advocates claim that it will be a factor of potent influence in determining the pressing question of the 'more equable distribution of wealth' and expect to see it force itself to the very front in colonial politics in the near future.
|
The object is to ascertain the conditions under which taxation will yield a maximum of revenue with a minimum of burden to the community. The tax in question conforms to these canons to a greater extent than any other tax. Its effect would not be immediate or sudden, but its tendency would be to shape the development of social conditions in the right direction, and to check the present tendency to inequality which governs the laws of the distribution of wealth.
|
'Its tendency would be to shape the development of social conditions in the right direction' |
CITIZEN. Brisbane, 4th November.
6 October 1933
The speculations to which we have been treated for some time past as to the prospects of a wonderful budget are no doubt carefully prepared statements by the publicity department of the Prime Minister, but his budget speech must have been most difficult of delivery owing to the large amount of tongue stuffed in his cheek.
From a Prime Minister I should have expected at least performance of his definite promise to abolish Federal land tax when 'budget equilibrium was attained'.
| 'Perhaps the huge surplus has spoilt the equilibrium again' |
These are his words, not mine, but perhaps the huge surplus has spoilt the equilibrium again, and he has broadcasted the money extracted by way of land tax, etc, in the relief of pleasure hunters, who are not now required to pay entertainments tax.
|
For what it is worth, I have wired the Prime Minister to-day as follows: 'Astounded at your breach of promise to abolish land tax when budget equilibrium was attained'.
J.T. ISLES
13 October 1933
Sir,
We read when the budget was announced, that the Government had made provision for the restoration of automatic increases to civil servants, to cost some £60,000 per annum. To-day we are told that the Land Tax Act is to be amended, so as to reimpose the super land tax.
| So we find that while one portion of the dwellers in the beehive is to be fed on honey, the other portion is to be sweated to produce the honey. |
'Who wouldn't be a farmer?' |
Who wouldn't be a farmer? Every day twelve hours, every week seven days—much nicer than being a civil servant, every day eight hours, every week five days, golf clubs out on Saturday.
'BUSH BEE'. West End.